Public and Private Censorship Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Public and Private Censorship - Term Paper ExampleRather, it is much more sound to assume that profit and market dominance result be the driving force. This brief editorial will seek to analyze the ways in which the media has recently come to be dominated by on the nose a handful of players, what this means for journalistic integrity, and how this bodes for the future of democracy within the United States. Regardless of the person branding that greets the reader, listener or viewer of the particular media outlet in doubtfulness, the fact remains that Viacom, NBC Universal, Walt Disney, CBS Corporation, discussion Corp, and Time Warner ultimately are the owner and/or the fiduciary agent behind whatever fuddled is being represented (Taylor 1). Whereas just 20-30 years ago, the field of media firms could non be described without tracing a complicated tree of ownership back to about 40 distinct and separate firms, the field has been more and more narrowed as a mass of mergers ha ve taken place. Just as with the banking industry, these mergers have merge power within the hands of but a few ultra-dominant market forces which have the power to make up ones mind and shape the way that Americans view the world and what particular items of interest are presented to them in any wedded instance. As such, the level of journalistic integrity that comes to be displayed is highly suspect as the goal and catamenia of the controlling interests is to display their own point of view, gain further profit margins, and provide a decently form of competition to their rivals. As can be noted from the direction that the news media has shifted within the old few years, the main drive is focused on sensationalism, high definition graphics, and other somewhat brazen-faced ways of integrating with the audience (Morris 1). This can be seen as a means of compensation for the escape of journalistic expertise and excellence within the field. As a function of the fact that storie s are not researched and fact-checked anywhere near the level that they used to be during the heyday of American journalism, poor quality and a litany of misprints and outright false information have been foisted upon the viewer, reader, and/or listener. Naturally, such a concentration of media power begs the question of to what degree the journalism is consumed is tainted by a high level of propaganda. One need whole step no further than the recent raucous with regards to the New York Times and the way that government gatekeepers give the last clearance for each and every quote that is attributed within the paper to understand the level to which a part with and impartial media is merely a figment of the imagination. The scandal in question began when the Romney and Obama campaigns had ultimate access to the compositions publications before they went to the presses (Michelson 1). The reason that these handlers were allowed to review the news before the rest of society did was giv en to operate that the campaigns stayed on message. However, as the reader can quickly infer, the message that is being presented is only a doctored view of reality and is likely oftentimes not the truth that would otherwise be presented.