The Socio-Cultural Impact on Love, Marriage, and Kinship

Carine Garcon ANT 3212 Wayne A. Abrahamson Spring 2013 The Socio-Cultural Impact on have sex, spousal relationship, and Kinship Ones status of the world is consistently altered by our surroundings and influenced by the events that take place. In the past nearly 50 years divorce rates have risen a significant incredibly high. many researchers have associated this phenomena the modern confederation marriage symbolizes and values. This idea and representation of shaft have conversely abnormal and impacted relationships. Thus, the topic that will be investigated is how society and cultural has bear on our notion of fare, marriage, and kinship.One of the ways society has impacted the notion of marriage is that fact that the government attempts to regulate marriages. A few states realize the brilliance of marriage, and they have taken action to try to change our notion on marriage. Louisiana, Arizona, and Arkansas they imagined in powder compact marriages. According to the jou rnal covenant marriage required the following This movement set out to recruit and streng wherefore marriages, reduce divorce rates, lessen the number of children born out of wedlock, discourages cohabitation, and frame marriage as an honorable and desirable institution. (Hawkins et al. 002166) Because of the fact that the contemporary tillage has lost sight of the significance of marriage, the government attempt to regulate the marriages within certain states. Furthermore, the state of Florida has made it harder for yokes to get married and also get a divorce. The state has now implemented a 3- day waiting period for marriage licenses if couples do not seek premarital education, hoping to reduce impulsive, ill-advised unions. (Hawkins et al. 2002166) It is clear why the government has attempted to regulate and modify the amount of marriages that potenti every last(predicate)y can happen.Years ago marriage was considered to be a divine, sacred union sh are between cardinal raft before matinee idol. This union was intended to be a union that lasted a life clipping and previously the option to dissipate the marriage did not exist. In the current state of marriage, people get married they do not see it as something that is supposed to be forever, but preferably as something temporarily. Divorce has become too easy and feasible for people to obtain. I personally believe this current generation people confuse lust for cut. Most people would tell someone that they love them, but instead it is really lust.It seems that no one really knows the differences between lust and love, so the dickens words are commonly mistaken and used in the wrong way. Even in movies and agglomerate entertainment, love and relationships are portrayed negatively with glamour. The typical story begins with a man who convinces a fille with the idea and possibility of love. Once she is vulnerable the couple would most likely indulge in versed intercourse. When this happens the man then leaves, the woman regrets the decision. These things are glamourized and popularized by the mass media and a result, the youth is then influenced to mimic the same.The psychological effects of the mass media are subtle, but long-term. (Galician 2004) As a child culmination from a Christian background I read the bible very often. The bible is a peachy source to view and analyze the changes that have happened throughout the last 5 decades, because much of the ideals were found upon its contents. In the book of Matthew chapter 2236-44 it states, Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law? Jesus replied Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with your mind.This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second command is similar stating, Love your neighbor as yourself. All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments. (Matthew 2236-44) Out of all the Ten Commandments these two were considered to be the most coveted a nd highly regarded. This emphasis on the idea that love should be a highly heralded and powerful word in is uses and approach. The order in which these commandments are given, also place emphasis and attention towards how one who is reading the text should perceive it.In the journal, On A Paradox Of Christian Love Liu exclaimed that these two commandments direct ones love to distinct objects. (Liu 2007681) The commandments were placed in a certain order as first and second to illustrate importance and respect. By putting these commandments in an order it is assumed that the one must achieve a spiritual love with everything in your torso and mind, and only after can you love can love someone else (neighbor). The bible has influenced a gravid amount of the Western society and culture. From a biblical stand point you cannot love anyone else unless your love is grow with a divine spirit.I believe that if it has to do with our culture then inversely it pertains to love, thus as a soci ety we are blinded by what we want to see. It is critical that one sees the consider to learn to take time and careful thought into deciding whether or not were in love. Love is patient, so its okay to take your time to fall for someone because if it is true love than it will reveal itself in its own right. Also, the stress placed upon by people on love results in the spending of time and hours wondering if there is true love in their relationship.The impact that culture has had on the social relations of love have led to the belief that love is based take out of what one can do for the other, while in its essence and purity love isnt based on that logic and reasoning but emotion and feeling. In the textbook it explains how a man fagged most of his time away from his home, so the child grew up under the influence of their mothers and matrilineal relatives. If laudation or shame failed to control the behavior of children, the withdrawal of maternal affection had a powerful effect . tabby 2003) In todays culture and society the result adverse conditions and occurrences are happening. By contemporary society, men are supposed to be considered as the primary provider for their families. Women are widely considered to be the ones that bear the responsibility of child bearing and keep oning the stability and homeostasis of the home. Though the effect is not the extent and original of a mother taking away her affection from a child, but the equivalent in damage of linearity would be a mother in this day and age placing the child in time out as a form of punishment.This idea also delves a deeper in the explanation of boyish girls who become quickly incorporated into the highly organized female kinship group, and boys who sought out special(prenominal) friendships with each other to provide mutual support in adulthood. (King 2003) In analyzation how love is specially affected by the socio-cultural factors of today, the analysis of the term kinship can be addre ssed to further the discussion. Kinship isnt just considered to be relationship through blood, but it also means relation by marriage, or adoption.Again television and mass has led us to believe that most families are generally tight knitwork and very close, but in reality most families are seriously dysfunctional. (Galician 2004) Throughout all of this dysfunction, families as yet manage to find some form of stability amongst them. Overall kin generally stick together, and maintain a decent relationship with each other. In the textbook King explains how marriages takes place in the quaint areas towards the east (Massachusett, Iroquois, Cherokee). He explained that if a man had a bride in mind he would have two options.Ask a family to propose a match to the other family, or to attract the girl himself. If the guy prove himself to be worthy the family would accept the couples sexual relationship, and if it eventually at the end of the process a espousal would take place. (King 2 003) The family tests the couples relationship based upon the sex and essentially, if the sex was proven adequate, then the couple would then get married. King further explained that an ordinary man would take extra wives to help most with their community duties or ambitions.Furthermore, in this time period bride service was very common. A new maintain would go live with his in-laws to perform these duties. (King 2003) These days, a new husband would not go live with his in- laws and he most certainly wouldnt be performing bride services. This is one example of the extreme changes that have occurred socially and culturally in regards to marriage. Conclusively, culture and media has had an impact on how we view marriage, love, and kinship. Most people no nightlong view marriage as being permanent, but instead as being temporary.They no interminable believe in fighting to make their relationship work, theyd much rather divorce or separate and prevent and reconciliation in their di fferences. It is worldwide postulation that love is difficult, but our culture has misled us to believe that love is effortlessly attainable. Even in regards to kinship, part of love and relationships with anyone is to maintain ties with your family. Overall, because of the socio-cultural conditions the ideas of relationships are ever changing and thus complex in its nature.References Cited Galician, M. (2004). Sex, love & romance in the mass media analysis & chiding of unrealistic portrayals & their influence. Mahwah, N. J. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. King, Glenn. Traditional Cultures A Survey of Nonwestern Experience and Achievement. (2003). Waveland Press, Long Grove, IL. Hawkins, Alan J. , Steven L. Nock, Julia C. Wilson, Laura Sanchez, and James D. Wright. Attitudes About Covenant Marriage and Divorce Policy Implications From a Three-State Comparison*. Family Relations 51. (2002) 166-175. Web. Huston, Ted L. The Social Ecology of Marriage and Other allude Unions. Journal of Marriage and Family 62. 2 (2000) 298-320. Web. 05 Feb. 2013. Liu, Qingping. On A Paradox Of Christian Love. Journal of Religious ethics 35. 4 (2007) 681-94. Print. Matthew 2236-44. The Holy Bible Containing the Old and New Testaments Translated out of the Original Tongues and with the Former Translations diligently Compared and Revised by His Majestys Special Command. Nashville Thomas Nelson, 1979. N. Print.